Managed security service providers (MSSPs) are now a core part of how organisations protect...
Vendor Risk Management Solutions: How Australian Organisations Reduce Third-Party Cyber Risk at Scale
First Published:
January 10, 2026
Content Written For:
Small & Medium Businesses
Large Organisations & Infrastructure
Government
Read Similar Articles
How SOC Services Operationalise Managed Detection and Response
Introduction Many organisations invest in advanced detection tools yet still struggle to turn...
SOC Services vs MDR (Managed Detection & Response)
Introduction In this article we discuss SOC services vs MDR. SOC services and Managed Detection...
SOC Services Australia: Strategic Guide
SOC services sit at the centre of modern cybersecurity operations. As organisations become more...
SOC 2 Certification: What It Really Means and How to Achieve It
SOC 2 certification is one of the most searched compliance terms in cybersecurity, particularly...
Vendor risk management solutions have become a board-level priority for Australian organisations. As supply chains expand and digital ecosystems grow, businesses increasingly rely on third parties to deliver critical services, manage sensitive data, and support core operations. However, each vendor introduces potential cyber, compliance, and operational risk.
As a result, regulators, auditors, and insurers now expect organisations to demonstrate mature, repeatable vendor risk management, not ad-hoc questionnaires or spreadsheet-based reviews. This article explains what modern vendor risk management solutions look like, why vendor risk assessments alone are no longer enough, and how Australian organisations can operationalise third-party risk management using managed services and platforms such as Vanta, Drata, and RiskRecon.
Key Takeaways
- Vendor risk management solutions are essential for Australian organisations to address cyber, compliance, and operational risks associated with third-party vendors.
- Modern solutions provide continuous oversight rather than relying solely on point-in-time vendor risk assessments.
- Key capabilities include centralised vendor inventories, structured risk assessments, continuous monitoring, and effective remediation tracking.
- Integrating vendor risk management with broader security programmes enhances organisational resilience and aligns with regulatory expectations.
- Managed vendor risk management services, such as those offered by CyberPulse, help organisations effectively implement and maintain vendor risk management solutions.
What Are Vendor Risk Management Solutions?
Vendor risk management solutions are structured programmes, tools, and services that help organisations identify, assess, monitor, and mitigate risks posed by third-party suppliers. These solutions typically cover cyber security risk, privacy obligations, compliance requirements, and operational resilience.
Unlike one-off vendor risk assessments, modern solutions provide continuous visibility across the vendor lifecycle, from onboarding and due diligence through to ongoing monitoring and offboarding. Consequently, organisations can demonstrate governance, reduce incident likelihood, and respond faster when supplier risks change.
In Australia, vendor risk management increasingly aligns with frameworks such as the ASD Essential Eight, ISO/IEC 27001, SOC 2, PCI DSS, IRAP, and OAIC privacy expectations. Therefore, effective solutions must support both security and compliance outcomes.
Why Vendor Risk Assessments Alone Are No Longer Enough
Vendor risk assessments remain a critical component of third-party risk management. However, assessments performed annually or at onboarding only provide a point-in-time view of risk. In contrast, today’s threat landscape changes constantly.
For example, a vendor that passed due diligence six months ago may later experience a ransomware incident, change its hosting provider, or fail to maintain security controls. Without continuous oversight, these changes can go unnoticed until an incident occurs.
Modern vendor risk management solutions address this gap by combining assessments with automation, evidence collection, and ongoing monitoring. As a result, organisations gain assurance that controls remain effective over time rather than relying on outdated documentation.
Key Capabilities of Modern Vendor Risk Management Solutions
Effective vendor risk management solutions typically include several core capabilities.
Centralised Vendor Inventory and Risk Tiering
First, organisations need a complete and accurate inventory of vendors. This inventory should classify suppliers by risk level based on data access, service criticality, and regulatory impact. For example, vendors handling personal information or supporting essential services should be prioritised for deeper review.
By contrast, low-risk vendors may require lighter-touch assessments. Therefore, risk tiering ensures effort is applied proportionately and efficiently.
Structured Vendor Risk Assessments
Vendor risk assessments remain foundational. These assessments typically evaluate security controls, privacy practices, business continuity, and compliance alignment. Increasingly, assessments map directly to recognised frameworks such as ISO 27001, SOC 2 Trust Services Criteria, or the ASD ISM.
Furthermore, structured assessments support audit readiness. For instance, ISO 27001 and SOC 2 auditors expect documented supplier risk evaluation processes, not informal reviews.
Continuous Monitoring and Evidence Collection
In addition, leading vendor risk management solutions provide ongoing monitoring. This may include automated evidence collection, security posture tracking, and external risk signals. Consequently, organisations can identify control degradation or emerging threats earlier.
Platforms such as Vanta and Drata support continuous compliance workflows, while tools like RiskRecon provide external security ratings that complement internal assessments.
Risk Treatment and Remediation Tracking
Identifying risk is only valuable if remediation follows. Therefore, mature solutions include workflows for tracking remediation actions, assigning ownership, and validating outcomes. Over time, this creates an auditable trail of risk treatment decisions.
This capability is especially important for regulated environments, including APRA-regulated entities and organisations subject to OAIC oversight.
Australian Regulatory and Compliance Drivers
In Australia, several regulatory and advisory bodies influence vendor risk management expectations.
The Australian Cyber Security Centre emphasises supply chain risk management as part of broader cyber resilience guidance (ACSC, 2024). Similarly, the OAIC expects organisations to take reasonable steps to ensure third parties protect personal information under the Privacy Act.
Additionally, compliance frameworks such as ISO/IEC 27001, SOC 2, PCI DSS, and IRAP all include explicit requirements for third-party risk management. As a result, vendor risk management solutions are no longer optional for organisations seeking certification or regulatory assurance.
Technology Platforms Supporting Vendor Risk Management
Many organisations adopt platforms to scale vendor risk management. Common examples include Vanta, Drata, and RiskRecon.
Vanta and Drata focus on compliance automation, evidence collection, and continuous control monitoring. These platforms are particularly effective for organisations pursuing ISO 27001, SOC 2, or similar attestations.
RiskRecon, by contrast, provides external cyber risk visibility by analysing vendors’ observable security posture. When used alongside internal assessments, it enhances risk detection and prioritisation.
However, technology alone is not a complete solution. Without proper configuration, governance, and operational ownership, platforms can become underutilised or misaligned with business risk.
The Case for Managed Vendor Risk Management Services
Many Australian organisations choose to augment technology with managed vendor risk management services. This approach combines platforms with specialist expertise to deliver consistent outcomes.
Managed services typically include vendor inventory management, risk tiering, assessment execution, evidence review, and remediation coordination. As a result, internal teams can focus on strategic risk decisions rather than administrative overhead.
For organisations with limited security or compliance resources, managed vendor risk management provides a practical path to maturity. It also supports executive and board reporting by translating technical findings into business-relevant risk insights.
CyberPulse delivers managed vendor risk management services aligned to Australian regulatory expectations, supported by platforms such as Vanta, Drata, and RiskRecon. This model ensures technology is embedded into a broader governance framework rather than operating in isolation.
Integrating Vendor Risk Management Into Broader Security Programmes
Vendor risk management should not operate as a standalone activity. Instead, it should integrate with incident response, penetration testing, and broader compliance programmes.
For example, high-risk vendors may be prioritised for incident response planning or tabletop exercises. Similarly, penetration testing findings can inform supplier risk ratings. When integrated effectively, vendor risk management solutions strengthen overall organisational resilience.
CyberPulse supports this integrated approach through services spanning third-party risk management, incident response, Essential Eight uplift, and managed compliance.
Common Pitfalls to Avoid
Despite increased awareness, many organisations struggle with vendor risk management. Common pitfalls include over-reliance on questionnaires, lack of ownership, inconsistent risk scoring, and failure to update assessments.
Additionally, some organisations deploy platforms without defining processes or success metrics. Consequently, tools generate data but fail to drive decisions. Avoiding these pitfalls requires a combination of governance, expertise, and continuous improvement.
Choosing the Right Vendor Risk Management Solution
When evaluating vendor risk management solutions, Australian organisations should consider several factors. These include alignment with regulatory requirements, scalability, integration with existing systems, and availability of local expertise.
Equally important is deciding whether to manage the programme internally or partner with a managed service provider. For many organisations, a hybrid model delivers the best balance of control, assurance, and efficiency.
How CyberPulse Helps Modernise Vendor Risk Management
CyberPulse helps Australian organisations modernise vendor risk management by combining proven platforms with hands-on delivery. We work with Vanta, Drata, and RiskRecon to design, implement, and operate vendor risk management programmes that scale with business growth.
Our approach focuses on outcomes, not just tooling. We help organisations reduce supplier risk, meet audit requirements, and demonstrate governance to regulators and stakeholders.
If your organisation is looking to move beyond manual vendor risk assessments and adopt effective vendor risk management solutions, CyberPulse can help. Speak with our team to discuss how managed vendor risk management can support your security and compliance objectives.
Book a Vendor Risk Strategy Session: HERE
Useful Links
External Resources
Browse to Read Our Most Recent Articles & Blogs
Subscribe for Early Access to Our Latest Articles & Resources
Connect with us on Social Media
