Penetration Testing Requirements in Australia: A Best-Practice Guide for 2026

Summary

Penetration testing has become a formal requirement for many Australian organisations, not because legislation mandates a single testing model, but because regulators, auditors, customers, and boards increasingly expect evidence that security controls are tested and effective.

Across Australia, frameworks such as APRA CPS 234, the Essential Eight, ISO/IEC 27001, SOC 2, and the Privacy Act all reference the need for regular security testing. However, none prescribe a one-size-fits-all approach. Instead, organisations are expected to apply risk-based, defensible penetration testing aligned to their environment and threat exposure.

This creates a challenge for decision-makers. What penetration testing is actually required in Australia, how often should it be performed, and how can scope be justified to regulators and auditors?

This guide explains penetration testing requirements in Australia for 2025, including:

• When penetration testing is mandatory versus strongly expected
• How Australian regulators assess testing adequacy
• Which types of penetration testing align to specific frameworks
• How to scope testing defensibly
• How CyberPulse helps organisations meet penetration testing requirements without over- or under-testing

Are Penetration Testing Requirements Mandatory in Australia?

Penetration testing is rarely mandated in legislation using prescriptive language. However, failure to conduct appropriate penetration testing can still result in regulatory findings, audit failures, or enforcement action.

In practice, penetration testing requirements in Australia fall into three categories.

Regulatory requirements

Regulators expect organisations to test the effectiveness of security controls, not merely document them. Penetration testing is widely recognised as one of the most effective ways to meet this expectation.

Compliance and certification requirements

Standards such as ISO 27001 and SOC 2 require ongoing security testing as part of their control frameworks.

Contractual and assurance requirements

Government agencies, enterprise customers, and insurers increasingly require penetration testing as a condition of doing business.

As a result, penetration testing has become a de facto requirement for many Australian organisations, particularly those handling sensitive data or operating in regulated industries.

Key Australian Frameworks Driving Penetration Testing Requirements

APRA CPS 234

APRA CPS 234 requires regulated entities to maintain information security controls that are tested for effectiveness. While CPS 234 does not mandate a specific testing method, penetration testing is commonly used to satisfy this requirement.

APRA expectations typically include:

• Regular testing aligned to risk
• Independent assessment
• Evidence that findings are addressed

Organisations unable to demonstrate effective testing may face supervisory action.

Essential Eight

The ACSC’s Essential Eight maturity model emphasises control effectiveness, particularly at higher maturity levels. Adversary simulation and penetration testing are recognised mechanisms for validating whether mitigations work in practice.

For organisations targeting Maturity Level Two or Three, penetration testing becomes increasingly important.

Privacy Act and Notifiable Data Breaches scheme

The Privacy Act requires organisations to take reasonable steps to protect personal information. Following a breach, regulators often assess whether penetration testing was performed as part of reasonable security practices.

Demonstrating regular penetration testing can materially reduce regulatory risk.

ISO/IEC 27001

ISO 27001 requires organisations to perform regular technical vulnerability assessments and testing. Penetration testing is a common and accepted method of meeting this requirement when scoped appropriately.

SOC 2

SOC 2 requires organisations to demonstrate the effectiveness of controls related to security and availability. Penetration testing is frequently used to provide independent assurance.

How Regulators and Auditors Assess Penetration Testing

One of the most misunderstood aspects of penetration testing requirements in Australia is how adequacy is assessed.

Regulators and auditors typically evaluate:

• Relevance to the organisation’s risk profile
• Scope justification and exclusions
• Testing frequency
• Independence and tester capability
• Evidence quality in reporting
• Remediation and retesting outcomes

Importantly, regulators rarely expect perfect security. They expect reasonable, defensible decisions backed by evidence.

Types of Penetration Testing and Their Compliance Use Cases

Web application penetration testing

Often expected for customer-facing portals, SaaS platforms, and applications handling personal or financial data. This testing aligns strongly with ISO 27001, SOC 2, and Privacy Act expectations.

Cloud penetration testing

Relevant for AWS, Azure, and GCP environments, particularly for APRA-regulated entities and IRAP-aligned workloads. Testing focuses on identity, configuration, and exposure risk.

Internal and external network penetration testing

Used to validate perimeter defences, assess lateral movement risk, and test segmentation and identity controls. This testing is commonly referenced in APRA CPS 234 assessments.

Wireless and physical penetration testing

Important for hybrid workplaces, healthcare, and education environments. These areas are often overlooked but increasingly scrutinised following incidents.

Red team exercises

Typically used where high assurance is required, boards demand realistic adversary simulation, or detection and response capabilities must be validated. While not mandatory for most organisations, they are highly defensible in high-risk environments.

How Often Is Penetration Testing Required?

There is no single mandated frequency under Australian frameworks. However, best-practice expectations typically include:

• At least annual testing for critical systems
• Testing after major changes such as new applications, cloud migrations, or mergers
• Testing following significant security incidents
• Testing when required by customers, insurers, or auditors

Frequency should be justified based on risk, not convenience.

Minimum Compliance Versus Defensible Assurance

Many organisations make the mistake of aiming for the minimum possible testing. While this may satisfy an audit in the short term, it can create significant exposure following an incident.

A more effective approach is to distinguish between minimum compliance and defensible assurance.

Best-practice organisations design penetration testing programs that clearly demonstrate:

• Risk-based scoping decisions
• Alignment to applicable frameworks
• Evidence of improvement over time

Best-Practice Penetration Testing Methodologies

High-quality penetration testing should align to recognised methodologies, including:

• NIST SP 800-115 for structured testing guidance
• PTES for execution and reporting consistency
• OWASP for web and application security
• OSSTMM for operational testing depth

Alignment to these frameworks strengthens the credibility of testing outcomes.

Why CyberPulse for Penetration Testing Services Australia

CyberPulse delivers penetration testing services Australia with a focus on outcomes, not volume.

Our approach:

• Intelligence‑led testing aligned to real threats
• Clear prioritisation based on business impact
• Executive‑ready reporting, not raw output
• Integrated remediation and retesting support
• Optional transition to managed, continuous testing

CyberPulse works as a long‑term security partner, helping organisations continuously reduce exposure rather than repeatedly rediscover the same issues.

Let’s Talk

Follow us on LinkedIn for practical insights, or contact us to speak with a CyberPulse expert.

Useful Links

• Penetration Testing Services Australia: The Definitive Guide for Serious Security Leaders
• Top 10 Penetration Testing Companies in Australia (2025)
• Penetration Testing for Compliance: Meeting ACSC, ISO 27001, and Essential Eight Requirements
• Penetration Testing Cost in Australia (2026 Pricing Guide)
• Penetration Testing (Pentesting / Pen testing) vs Managed Security Testing: Which Offers Better Protection?

Related Services

• Penetration Testing Services
• Security Assessments
• Incident Response Services
• Automated Penetration Testing

External Resources

• ASD Guide on mitigating cyber incidents